Cameron Boozer · Rebounds
- Pick & Line
- Over 8.5
- Fair Value
- 9.8 (-184)
- Book
- Fanatics (-113)
Boozer’s established starting workload and double-digit rebounding baseline support this total without requiring improved shooting.
Prices as of .
By WagerBird Quantitative Research Desk · SkyBurst Technology, Inc. (NJ DGE Vendor #0096475) · Released · Last updated (CT)
| Sportsbook | MEM | TOR | Updated (CT) | Execution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | +2.5-102 | -2.5-118 | BetMGM | |
| Caesars | +3-110 | -3-110 | Caesars | |
| DraftKings | +3.5-119 | -3.5-101 | DraftKings | |
| FanDuel | +3.5-115 | -3.5-105 | FanDuel | |
| Fanatics | +3-110 | -3-110 | Fanatics | |
| ProphetX | +3.5-111 | -3.5+108 | ProphetX |
Full market: 39 sportsbooks, consensus MEM +3.5. Links shown for licensed books we work with.
The Memphis Grizzlies at Toronto Raptors spread opened at TOR -3.5 on WagerBird's per-book price tape (first recorded Sun, Nov 8, 11:00 PM CT) and currently sits at TOR -3.5 across 43 tracked sportsbooks, representing an unchanged median since the opening quote. Scheduled kickoff is Mon, Nov 9, 6:30 PM CT, and all live sportsbook quotes on this page are timestamped as of Mon, Nov 9, 8:38 AM CT.
At Mon, Nov 9, 7:05 AM CT, 11 quoting sportsbooks adjusted this market in the same direction toward MEM by a median of 0.5 pts. Broad repricing across multiple independent operators reflects consolidated market order flow and updated consensus pricing on the Memphis Grizzlies at Toronto Raptors spread.
Across the 39 sportsbooks currently quoting the Memphis Grizzlies at Toronto Raptors spread, the top-to-bottom market spread is 1.0 pt, creating measurable price dispersion for bettors comparing lines across licensed operators.
Stripping out sportsbook overround (vig), the 20-book consensus prices MEM at +3.5 -106 (51.4% vig-free probability) and TOR at -3.5 +106 (48.6% vig-free probability).
Best execution prices among licensed partner sportsbooks right now: MEM +3.5 -111 at ProphetX; TOR -2.5 -118 at BetMGM.
In the NBA spreads betting lane, WagerBird's released plays have beaten the release book's closing line 2 times, tied 0, and lost 3 season to date (5 graded releases through 2026-11-08). Every historical settled release can be verified in the downloadable CSV audit log below.
| Window | Beat | Tied | Lost | Measured | Beat % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season to date | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Last 30 days | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
WagerBird measures closing-line value (CLV) by comparing each pick's release line and price against the pre-kickoff closing number at the exact sportsbook where the pick was released (settled picks through 2026-11-08).
Embed live vig-free odds, implied probability split, and fair value telemetry for Memphis Grizzlies at Toronto Raptors (Spread) attributed to WagerBird Quantitative Research Desk · SkyBurst Technology, Inc. (NJ DGE Vendor #0096475):
<iframe src="https://wagerbird.com/markets/embed/nba/memphis-grizzlies-at-toronto-raptors-spread-2026-11-09-34489" title="Memphis Grizzlies at Toronto Raptors Spread Vig-Free Odds & Implied Probability | WagerBird" width="100%" height="340" style="border:0;border-radius:6px;overflow:hidden;" loading="lazy"></iframe> <p style="font-size:12px;margin-top:4px;">Source: <a href="https://wagerbird.com/markets/nba/memphis-grizzlies-at-toronto-raptors-spread-2026-11-09-34489">MEM @ TOR Spread Vig-Free Odds & Implied Probability</a> by WagerBird Quantitative Research Desk · SkyBurst Technology, Inc. (NJ DGE Vendor #0096475).</p>
Reconciles bottom-up pre-game sportsbook posted points lines across Memphis Grizzlies's primary 6-man rotation against the top-down posted team total.
-23.9 Pts Desk Dislocation (Core-6 Implies 89.6 vs. 113.5 Posted Team Total)
| Core-6 Sum | Core-6 Share | Implied Total | Posted Total | Reconciliation Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.0 | 90.4% | 89.6 | 113.5 (-105) | -23.9 |
| Core-6 Player | Tonight Line | Team Scoring Share % | Tonight's Implied Prop Share % | 6-Game Line Drift | 6G Trend | Outcome Tag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 Ty Jerome MEM · Prev 20.5 (+1.0) | 21.5 | 26.1% | 18.9%(-7.2% vs Hist) | -2.0 | Team Tide Shift | |
#2 Cameron Boozer MEM · Prev 16.5 (+1.0) |
-23.9 Pts Desk Dislocation (Core-6 Implies 89.6 vs. 113.5 Posted Team Total)
+13.2 Pts Desk Dislocation (Core-6 Implies 128.7 vs. 115.5 Posted Team Total)
Reconciles bottom-up pre-game sportsbook posted points lines across Toronto Raptors's primary 6-man rotation against the top-down posted team total.
+13.2 Pts Desk Dislocation (Core-6 Implies 128.7 vs. 115.5 Posted Team Total)
| 17.5 |
| 17.5% |
| 15.4%(-2.1% vs Hist) |
| +2.0 |
| Team Tide Shift |
#3 Cedric Coward MEM · Prev 13.5 (0.0) | 13.5 | 16.0% | 11.9%(-4.1% vs Hist) | 0.0 | Steady Share |
#4 Jerami Grant MEM · Prev 10.5 (0.0) | 10.5 | 11.4% | 9.3%(-2.1% vs Hist) | 0.0 | Steady Share |
#5 Jaylen Wells MEM · Prev 10.5 (-1.0) | 9.5 | 9.5% | 8.4%(-1.1% vs Hist) | -2.0 | Usage Transfer |
#6 Cam Spencer MEM · Prev 7.5 (+1.0) | 8.5 | 9.9% | 7.5%(-2.4% vs Hist) | +2.0 | Team Tide Shift |
| Core-6 Sum | Core-6 Share | Implied Total | Posted Total | Reconciliation Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101.0 | 78.5% | 128.7 | 115.5 (-109) | +13.2 |
| Core-6 Player | Tonight Line | Team Scoring Share % | Tonight's Implied Prop Share % | 6-Game Line Drift | 6G Trend | Outcome Tag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 RJ Barrett TOR · Prev 26.5 (-2.0) | 24.5 | 18.5% | 21.2%(+2.7% vs Hist) | +2.0 | Team Tide Shift | |
#2 Scottie Barnes TOR · Prev 22.5 (+1.0) | 23.5 | 19.3% | 20.3%(+1.0% vs Hist) | +2.0 | Usage Transfer | |
#3 Immanuel Quickley TOR · Prev 16.5 (+2.0) | 18.5 | 14.7% | 16.0%(+1.3% vs Hist) | +1.0 | Usage Transfer | |
#4 Ja'Kobe Walter TOR · Prev 14.5 (-2.0) | 12.5 | 8.3% | 10.8%(+2.5% vs Hist) | +1.0 | Team Tide Shift | |
#5 Collin Murray-Boyles TOR · Prev 14.5 (-2.0) | 12.5 | 11.1% | 10.8%(-0.3% vs Hist) | +3.0 | Team Tide Shift | |
#6 Jakob Poeltl TOR · Prev 9.5 (0.0) | 9.5 | 6.6% | 8.2%(+1.6% vs Hist) | +1.0 | Steady Share |
Boozer’s established starting workload and double-digit rebounding baseline support this total without requiring improved shooting.